The daily file hunt.
Someone spends a couple of hours every day finding attachments in email and stitching them into one big file. An agent does it every morning before they log in.
Service 03
We map your processes, show where AI pays off, run the pilot, build agents for each department and scale it across the company — on your own Microsoft or Google environment, with a budget you control and an effect you can measure.
Most companies are somewhere between “the board wants an AI plan” and “we bought licences and three people use them”.
The questions are the same everywhere. Where do we start? In what order? How do we run a pilot that shows results quickly? What is possible, what isn't, and what will it cost? Who has access to which data now that Copilot or Claude is switched on? Why is the bill growing while usage isn't? And how do we know any of this is working?
We answer them with a method, not a demo.
We break your company's processes into small steps and measure what each one costs today — in time and money. That shows exactly where AI saves the most. We set targets for one year and three years, run the first pilots, build small agents for each department, and roll them out with training, access rules and cost control. Then we keep watching the bottlenecks and fixing them.
You always know how much you invest in AI, where it goes, and what effect you expect.
| What | In practice |
|---|---|
| AI readiness and roadmap | Where AI fits in your business, in what order, what it will cost, what to expect |
| Process map and effect model | Every process broken into steps, current cost and time per step, targets for 1 and 3 years |
| Pilots with fast delivery | One or two use cases live in weeks, with results you can show the board |
| Department agents | Small agents that take repetitive work off each team |
| Rollout and adoption | Training, champions in each team, from “one person uses it” to “everyone does” |
| Access and security | Who sees what: permissions, data sources and policies mapped and fixed |
| Cost control | Licences, tokens, infrastructure and connectors — what you pay for and what you actually use |
| Your own AI workspace | For companies that want to run AI independently: an enterprise workspace like Langdock, set up and governed in-house |
Every process has a price. We break your processes into small steps — typically around ten process groups with around ten sub-processes each — and record what each step costs in time and money today, and what it should cost in a year and in three. That map becomes your AI plan, your budget and your scorecard. Back-office processes are usually where it pays off first.
Someone spends a couple of hours every day finding attachments in email and stitching them into one big file. An agent does it every morning before they log in.
A team consolidates data from ten Excel files into a single report every week. An agent pulls, checks and merges them, and flags what doesn't add up.
A construction company receives tender requests with ten or more attached files. An agent reads the documents, pulls out the scope, prepares a preliminary estimate and sends it into an approval workflow — so the estimator starts from a draft, not a blank page.
What we need from you: a sponsor in leadership, one owner per department, and access to the systems the agents will work with.
The company had Microsoft 365 and Copilot licences and almost no use of them. We built the data infrastructure and ETL pipelines, a context layer over company data so AI answers from the company's own knowledge, and the first AI agents. Then we trained the business teams on Copilot. The client's team now runs it; we stay on for new agents.
Pricing on request.
Your data stays inside your company. We build on your own Microsoft or Google environment, or a workspace you control, with access mapped to roles. Before rollout we check who can see what — and fix it.
With the audit. In a few weeks you know where AI saves the most, in what order to do it and what it will cost.
Usually three reasons: it can't see the right data, people don't know what to ask it, and nobody owns adoption in each team. We fix all three.
It stays in your environment, under your security rules. We also check and fix who can access what before anything is rolled out.
Against the process map: the time and cost of each step before and after. Not “people feel faster” — hours and pounds.
It depends on your stack and your use cases, and it's often more than one. We'll recommend based on the process map, not on a partnership.
Yes — that's the goal. For companies that want full independence we set up an enterprise AI workspace like Langdock and train your team to run it.
Usually unused licences, expensive models doing simple work, and connectors nobody needs. We map usage against value and cut what doesn't pay.
We'll start with your processes, not with a tool.